Environmental Research Foundation  [Printer-friendly version]
June 10, 2006


[Rachel's introduction: This is the talk Peter Montague gave June 10
at the national precaution conference in Baltimore. The original
PowerPoint slides can be found here. The slides were accompanied by
a longer printed handout and a list of potential allies that we
could join with to develop a movement for precaution and prevention.]

By Peter Montague

1. The problem

** What we've got on our hands is a system that CANNOT prevent harm

** Skip Spitzer of Root Action describes it as a "structure of

Confronting the structure of harm demands that we THINK BIG

Corporations are pervasive, powerful entities compelled to

(a) seek narrow self-interest

(b) produce economic concentration

(c) externalize social and environmental harms

(d) create perpetual growth.

The mass media, public relations, science, education, and the culture
of consumption and wealth reflect and reinforce the structure of harm.

The structure of harm is projected internationally by economic,
military, political and cultural means.

Intolerance, patriarchy, white privilege, and white supremacy feed
upon, and are fed by, the corporate system

The government supports the structure of harm by protecting corporate
interests because of

(a) corporate influence ($), and

(b) the need for economic growth

Together all these factors produce, support and maintain the structure
of harm.

2. But times are ripening for deep change

** The end of cheap oil is here, or soon will be

** Global warming and water shortages are real

** Ecological limits are real (no place left to throw stuff "away",
for example)

** Many families are living with major insecurity (wages stagnant,
good jobs disappearing, health costs soaring, the children's future

** More and more, people are living with chronic illnesses

** The social safety net is being shredded

** The corporate system is beset by multiple crises and this is
creating opportunities for thinking about new ways of living and being
in the world

** The world is getting primed for a precautionary approach, a new way
of thinking and being (a "new" way that is really ancient, as Oren
Lyons reminded us yesterday)

3. Building a movement

** History tells us that deep change is possible; every system can be
challenged and changed. But it requires a social movement to make it

What is a movement?

A social movement is a joining of campaigns, associations, organi-
zations, and coalitions that share a common vision and overall goals,
symbols, and information, plus a tremendous sense of solidarity

** We've got what it takes

** We outnumber our adversaries at least 2 to 1 and often by far more

** All our adversaries have going for them is "divide and rule."

** Therefore, to alter the structure of harm, we need to get together
and stay together

** If our adversaries fail to divide us, the game is over for them

Successful movements engage the major sectors of society -- workers,
women, students, youth, intellectuals and others sharing a common set
of grievances

The grievances we share are:

(a) the social and environmental harms needlessly and stupidly created
by the structure of harm and

(b) the denial of opportunity to choose other paths by democratic

A successful movement to modify the structure of harm will be multi-
issue, international, diverse and demo-cratically inclusive, aiming
for class, race, and gender justice, and environmental, economic, and
social sustainability

** A successful movement to alter the structure of harm will seek
fundamental change.

** "Greening" the structure of harm will not alter the structure
(though it may still be desirable).

This raises an important issue that every movement faces:

Reform or Transform?

** Do we stick with short-term winnable goals, or do we aim to
transform the structure of harm?

** One answer is, We can aim to do both at the same time.

** We can reframe our local issues so they reveal the nature of the
system that gave rise to them.

Finding Allies

** Many of us work on "environmental health," but people working on
dozens of other issues are using, or could use, a preventive approach.

** All of them (and more) could be allied in a movement

(See the list of potential allies.)

** Instead of expecting them to join US, we can join THEM

** Each of our groups could appoint an ambassador whose job it is to
search out new allies

To broaden our appeal, we can include the 3 environments in all our

i. The natural environment (air, water)

ii. The built environment (sprawl, highways, brownfields)

iii. The all-important social environment (low income, social
exclusion, insecurity, stress, sexism, racism)

We can help build a prevention and precaution movement by developing
state or regional groups ("larger than local") to help with
organizing, training, leadership development, and getting hold of

Stable communities require a "precautionary economics" that aims to
prevent job loss by developing local businesses that are rooted in
communities. We can hook up with groups that are focused on local
economic revitalization to create jobs and stabilize communities.

4. Developing a common vision and agenda

As Yogi Berra once said, "If you don't know where you're going, you
might not get there."

The structure of harm rests on the assumption of perpetual growth in
material production, which is impossible on a finite planet.

So something new is needed. What will it look like and feel like?

The whole system is set up to convince us that "There is No
Alternative" (TINA)

But we can describe many alterna-tives that already exist in the U.S.
now. (For examples, see Alperovitz, America Beyond Capitalism.)

Eventually we can develop a foundational economic/political agenda
that systematically addresses the underlying issues of corporate
power, an economic system that requires perpetual growth, and a
hollowed-out democracy.

As our friends at smartMeme remind us,

We can develop a story-based strategy for changing the culture, with
sympathetic characters that personalize issues, engage people's
values, foreshadow the future, and help people see themselves working
and living in a new world.

A precautionary goal

** From 1765 to 1865 activists in England and the U.S. made slavery
repugnant and unthinkable

** WE can make it repugnant and unthinkable to make decisions without
asking, "How little harm can we do?"