Poughkeepsie (N.Y.) Journal  [Printer-friendly version]
January 29, 2006

BUILDING SURGE HURTS SHORES

[Rachel's introduction: U.S. coastal communities are endangered by
land-use policies that allow building right on the water's edge, plus
powerful storms that sweep away anything in their path. A
precautionary approach might include policies to control growth in
danger zones, plus policies to protect local economies from being
"developed" to a point where they no longer serve the needs of local
people.]

More disasters of Hurricane Katrina-proportions are a certainty
because the United States has no policy to control growth in danger
zones at the water's edge.

In a single generation, land along the nation's fragile coasts has
been gobbled up, concentrating wealth at the shore, threatening the
environment and putting at risk millions of people and property worth
billions of dollars.

While the Hudson River Valley is among the least-prone coastal areas
to hurricane damage, the estuary shares many of the other stresses
affecting U.S. coastal communities. Here, the desire to live on the
water that is fueling a building boom around the country is compounded
by our proximity to New York City and its many commuters and second-
home owners.

Thousands of new homes and hundreds of thousands of square feet of
office and retail space are proposed for construction on the shores of
the Hudson River in the mid-Hudson Valley alone. Development
throughout the Hudson's vast watershed has already been linked to
measurable declines in the water quality of the streams that feed the
Hudson River estuary.

A three-month Gannett News Service examination found:

** Approximately 23 percent of the nation's estuaries do not meet
state and federal clean water standards for swimming, fishing or
supporting marine species. While much of the Hudson is safe for
swimming, the state advises against eating many fish species because
of contamination.

** In many seashore towns, once-robust commercial fishing and
shipbuilding industries have been replaced by tourism-driven economies
and lower wages.

** Demand for waterfront property has driven home prices so high that
workers who staff the shops, restaurants, schools and police
departments can't afford to live nearby.

** Industrial pollution remains a burden, as cleanup costs impede some
revitalization efforts. New York's Brownfield cleanup law has helped
communities and developers subsidize the cost of cleaning polluted
waterfronts, but contamination remains costly.

Communities could decline

If runaway land consumption and relentless growth in automobile use
continue unchecked, many healthy shore communities could face sharp
declines over the next 25 years, according to Dana Beach, director of
the South Carolina Coastal Conservation League and an authority on
coastal sprawl.

"When we modify watersheds (with roads and buildings) we are changing
the physical attributes, the biological attributes of the water bodies
embedded in those watersheds," Beach said.

Paved surfaces, for instance, interrupt the water cycle, preventing
rainwater from percolating into the ground and recharging underground
water reserves. The pavement tends to increase stream erosion and
degrade habitat because rainwater cascades quickly off of pavement,
filling streams with explosive force. Pollutants such as salt and oils
from roads flow off pavement directly into streams.

That, and other changes to the watershed, have contributed to a
wholesale change in the composition of fish species in many Hudson
River tributaries -- with fewer overall fish species now present than
a few decades ago.

The federal government has a patchwork of regulations and agencies
that focus on pollution, flood control, the environment and growth
patterns.

The state controls some land-use decisions on the coast, as shown by
New York's decision last year to deny St. Lawrence Cement Co.'s plans
to build a cement plant on the Hudson River in Columbia County. That
decision was based on a federal law executed by the states that is
intended to protect the nation's coastline.

Most land-use decisions, however, are in the hands of the smallest
governments -- the cities, towns and villages. Volunteer planning
boards consider development proposals and make decisions based on the
zoning ordinances on the books.

Those boards are considering proposals for thousands of waterfront
condominiums, single-family homes, restaurants and retail and office
space in the valley -- including Kingston, Poughkeepsie, Beacon,
Newburgh, Fishkill, Lloyd, Hyde Park and Esopus.

In coastal communities across the country, local residents,
professional activists and others are struggling to check encroaching
sprawl and development.

New advocacy taking hold

But the traditional position of many environmentalists -- opposed to
any and all new construction near sensitive marshes, wetlands and
waterways -- is giving way to a new and more savvy form of advocacy.

It's evident in places such as Kingston, where a coalition of groups,
Friends of Kingston Waterfront, has proposed an alternative
development plan for two riverfront parcels where developers want to
build more than 2,500 homes, as well as businesses.

The advocates push "smart growth" and "new urbanism" ideas, that
seek to concentrate construction in areas already developed, where
public infrastructure such as water and sewer service and schools can
serve the new population. The strategy is to concentrate population
growth in these areas, leaving outlying areas open for wilderness,
recreation or farming.

Recently, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration formed a partnership to promote smart-
growth principles to coastal communities.

"Our role is to provide coastal communities with the best information
possible so they can make informed decisions about where and how to
grow," said Tim Torma, an EPA manager in the agency's smart-growth
program.

EPA experts are assisting planners in Aquidneck Island, R.I., to
implement a master plan for developing 10 miles of coast on
Narragansett Bay north of Newport, R.I.

"This really gives voice to what island residents said they wanted,"
Tina Dolen, Executive Director of the Aquidneck Island Planning
Commission. "They told us they wanted environmental protection, access
to the water, roadways that were not so dangerous and a better-looking
commercial development area."

Gannett News Service conducted the investigation of coastal
development.

Dan Shapley contributed local context to this report. He can be
reached at dshapley@poughkeepsiejournal.com

On the Web

Hudson River Estuary Program:
www.dec.state.ny.us/website/hudson/hrep.html

Copyright 2006 PoughkeepsieJournal.com