Detroit News
January 30, 2006


Rachel's summary: The Ecology Center in Ann Arbor, Michigan, has just
released a report showing that toxic chemicals are found in automobile
interiors at levels 5 to 10 times as high as those found in homes and

Chemical industry disputes report on dangers; Volvo cited as leader in
interior air quality.

Jeff Plungis

WASHINGTON -- A report by an Ann Arbor environmental group that says
toxic chemicals are present in automobile interiors at levels five to
10 times higher than those found in homes and offices has sparked
protests from the chemical industry and interest from automakers.

The report, "Toxic at Any Speed," was released by the Ecology Center
on Jan. 11, amid the din of the North American International Auto Show
in Detroit.

The report, based on samples of windshield film and dust samples from
randomly selected cars made by 11 leading manufacturers, concludes
there is a pervasive safety threat that few consumers know about: Cars
can expose their occupants to worrisome levels of toxic chemicals,
emitted from the materials used to make seating, carpets, arm rests
and wire coverings.

The Environmental Protection Agency has called indoor air pollution
one of the top five environmental risks to public health, said Jeff
Gearhart, an Ecology Center researcher who co-wrote the report.
According to the center's tests, car air quality is worse than what is
typically found in buildings and far worse than outdoor air -- at
least as far as two types of toxic chemicals are concerned.

The pattern of one of the chemicals cited in the report, a flame-
retardant named decabrominated diphenyl ether, or deca-BDE, has been
accumulating in the environment and is the subject of a growing number
of studies, Gearhart said. The chemical has been linked to health
effects in laboratory animals similar to other toxic chemicals, like
slowing brain development and causing reproductive problems and

"They could create a legacy like PCBs," Gearhart said of the flame
retardant BDE, referring to a now-banned toxic chemical that found its
way up the food chain. "They have all the lineage of that type of
environmental disaster. We think the writing is on the wall. The smart
people within the auto industry know that."

The Ecology Center cited Ford subsidiary Volvo Car Corp. as an
industry leader in following a policy to reduce flame-retardant
chemicals as concern has grown in Europe. Volvo and other well-
performing companies prove the feasibility of providing safer
alternatives, Gearhart said.

After the report, Volvo issued a statement touting its models' "best
interior air quality." The test scores were the result of a conscious
company policy to reduce interior emissions and improve air filtering,
the company said.

"In an age when many people suffer from asthma and allergies, it is
only natural for Volvo cars to offer its customers a good environment
even inside the car," said Anders Karrberg, Volvo's environmental

General Motors Corp. and BMW vehicles performed better than average
for all chemicals tested. Mercedes, Chrysler, Toyota and Subaru had
higher than average concentrations of both kinds of toxic chemicals.

Some companies had dramatically different results for different
chemicals. Hyundai had the lowest score of the 11 auto companies
tested for flame retardants -- with only a tiny trace equivalent to
what is found outdoors. But it had the highest score for a toxic
plastic softening group of chemicals called phthalates.

The Ecology Center said these chemicals have been linked to liver,
kidney and reproductive problems in lab animals. In 2003, the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention said phthalates could cause
developmental problems in children.

Hyundai officials met with the Ecology Center last week to explore
ways to reduce their use of phthalates, Gearhart said.

But not everyone is convinced the chemicals cited in the study present
a problem.

The Bromine Science and Environmental Forum, the industry association
representing the four manufacturers of bromine-based flame retardants,
said the Ecology Center was asking manufacturers to abandon a proven
chemical for alternatives that may not be as effective. There were
297,000 car fires in the U.S. in 2004, the group said.

"Automobiles are significant heat sources and therefore require the
most effective flame retardants available," forum chairman Raymond
Dawson said in a statement.

And automakers have already agreed to phase out two of the three flame
retardant chemicals cited in the report, said Eron Shosteck, Alliance
of Automobile Manufacturers spokesman. The remaining chemical has been
studied by the European Union for 10 years and has been proven safe,
Shosteck said.

Even so, lawmakers and manufacturers around the world have attempted
to reduce exposure to some of the chemicals cited by the Ecology

Reach Jeff Plungis at (202) 662-8735 or